Development of Design, Explain, Development, And Evaluation-Project Based Learning (DEDEn-PjBL) Model in Stimulating Children's Creativity

Main Article Content

Sadaruddin Sadaruddin
Arifin Ahmad
Baso Jabu
Syamsuardi Syamsuardi
Usman Usman
Hasmawaty Hasmawaty

Abstract

This research is research and development which aims to describe the level of need, prototype description, validity, practicality and effectiveness of the Design, Explain, Development, and Evaluation - Project Based Learning (PjBL) model in stimulating early childhood creativity. Data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and questionnaires. Data analysis techniques using descriptive and inferential data analysis. The research procedure begins with the investigation, design, realization, and test-evaluation-revision phases. The description of the needs analysis results shows that teachers need practical and effective learning models to stimulate children's creativity. The prototype description in the form of a model book and teacher's manual has been improved three times based on the input of expert validators and practitioners. It produces the DEDEn-PjBL model that can stimulate children's creativity. The results of the content validity test and the device's validity for all aspects are in the minimal category of "valid," so the DEDEn-PjBL model in stimulating children's creativity is declared valid. The results of the practicality test through the teacher's response questionnaire for all aspects are in the minimal category of "good," and the instrument for observing the implementation of the model shows that the average percentage of all aspects for five meetings is P >70% so that the DEDEn-PjBL model in stimulating children's creativity is declared practical. The effectiveness test results began with analyzing the pretest and post-test score data, which increased from the "low" to "very high" category. The data tested for normality with pretest results of 0.067 > Sig. 0.05 and posttest results in 0.081 > Sig. 0.05 so that the data is "normally distributed" after a hypothesis test, which shows the result tcount (14.714) > ttable (2.145), H0 rejected, and H1 accepted with a value of Sig. 0.00 > 0.05, which indicates that there is an influence of the DEDEn-PjBL model in stimulating children's creativity. The next step is the result of the mean N Gain Score is 0.7188 in the "high" category and a percentage value of 71.88% in the "quite effective" category. The N Gain test results show that the DEDEn-PjBL model is "quite effective" in stimulating children's creativity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sadaruddin, S., Ahmad, A., Jabu, B., Syamsuardi, S., Usman, U., & Hasmawaty, H. (2023). Development of Design, Explain, Development, And Evaluation-Project Based Learning (DEDEn-PjBL) Model in Stimulating Children’s Creativity. Journal of Research and Multidisciplinary, 6(2), 770-786. https://doi.org/10.5281/jrm.v6i2.81
Section
Articles

References

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” In Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” Westview Press.
Ata-Akturk, A., & Sevimli-Celik, S. (2023). Creativity in early childhood teacher education: beliefs and practices. International Journal of Early Years Education, 31(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2020.1754174
Chen, S. Y., Lai, C. F., Lai, Y. H., & Su, Y. S. (2022). Effect of project-based learning on development of students’ creative thinking. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Education, 59(3), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720919846808
Dolenc, P., & Čehovin, G. (2020). Conceptions and attitudes towards creativity among pre-service and in-service preschool teachers (Pojmovanja ustvarjalnosti in stališča do te pri sedanjih in bodočih vzgojiteljicah predšolskih otrok). In Revija za elementarno izobraževanje (Vol. 13, Issue 3, pp. 289–310). https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.13.3.289-310.2020
Florida, R., Mellander, C., & KIng, K. (2015). Global Creativity Indeks. Martin Prosperity Institute. http://www-2.rotman.utoronto.ca/mpi/content/the-global-creativity-index-2015/
Kemendikbud. (2014). Standar Nasional Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Ketabi, S., Zabihi, R., & Ghadiri, M. (2012). Bridging theory and practice: How creative ideas flourish through personal and academic literacy practices. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsp.2012.182
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215
Munandar, U. (1997). Mengembangkan Insiatif Dan Kreativitas Anak. Psikologika: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Psikologi, 2(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.20885/psikologika.vol2.iss2.art3
Musdalifah, M., Anas, M., & Sadaruddin, S. (2020). Peningkatan Kreativitas Anak Melalui Metode Discovery Pada Pembelajaran Sains Di Taman Kanak-Kanak Aisyiyah Bustanul Athfal Mario. TEMATIK: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.26858/tematik.v6i1.14438
Nurasih, B., Syamsuardi, S., & Ria, A. S. E. (2022). Penerapan Model PJBL Berbasis Bahan Bekas Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kreativitas Anak Kelompok B. EDUSTUDENT: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(3), 164. https://doi.org/10.26858/edustudent.v1i3.27519
Patston, T. J., Kaufman, J. C., Cropley, A. J., & Marrone, R. (2021). What Is Creativity in Education? A Qualitative Study of International Curricula. Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(2), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20978356
Plomp & Nienke. (2013). Introduction to Educational Design Research: An Introduction. Educational Design Research, 11–50. http://www.slo.nl/downloads/2009/Introduction_20to_20education_20design_20research.pdf/download
Puspitasari, E. (2015). Pemetaan Kreativitas Anak Usia 4-6 Tahun di TK Laboratorium PG-PAUD Universitas Riau. Educhild Pendidikan Dan Sosial, 4(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.33578/jpsbe.v4i1.2802
Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice, 2nd ed. In Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice, 2nd ed. Elsevier Academic Press.
Rupérez, F. L. (2020). El currículo y la educación en el siglo XXI (Narcea). Original work published 2020. https://www.perlego.com/book/2046320/el-currculo-y-la-educacin-en-el-siglo-xxi-la-preparacin-del-futuro-y-el-enfoque-por-competencias-pdf
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining Creativity: The science of human innovation. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 15, Issue 2). Oxford University Press.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. In Bandung CV Alfabeta. Bandung Alf.
Tok, E. (2022). Early childhood teachers’ roles in fostering creativity through free play. International Journal of Early Years Education, 30(4), 956–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2021.1933919
Trianto. (2009). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. In Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Kencana.

Most read articles by the same author(s)