Mechanics of Manipulation: A Comparative Analysis of Orwell’s 1984 and Chomsky’s Propaganda Model

Main Article Content

Afifa Rahman

Abstract

1984 by George Orwell is a remarkable book which can be used to explain the symbiotic relationship between mass media and institutional structures. By using the propaganda model introduced and popularized by Edward S. Herman and Naom Chomskey, this paper intends to assess the components which are used to prompt a certain group of people to fall under a despotic influence where citizens, willingly, yet unwittingly, submit their agency to mass domination. In the process, this paper will investigate the agency of mass media in producing such willing but unwitting submissive citizens much like how "Big Brother" manipulated the citizens of "Oceania" into embracing the cult-like government system. This qualitative research applied the close reading method to thoroughly analyze the interdisciplinary point of view of both media discourse and the totalitarian mindset of powerful institutional structures, like the Party. In their book Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, Herman and Chomsky identifies five media filters to explain the mechanism on which the media industry operates. In 1984, we see Orwell explaining through Emmanuel Goldstein’s book “The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism”, how instruments like posters, telescreens, certain ideologies, fabricated news etc. are used to manipulate the perception of reality of the citizens. This paper made a comparative analysis to measure up which of these filters are applicable to the scenario of 1984. The ambit of this paper will be limited to scrutiny of the mechanism which enables all-powerful authority to come into existence rather than investigation of the impact of all- powerful authority on citizens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahman, A. (2025). Mechanics of Manipulation: A Comparative Analysis of Orwell’s 1984 and Chomsky’s Propaganda Model. Journal of Research and Multidisciplinary, 8(1), 960-973. https://doi.org/10.5281/jrm.v8i1.103
Section
Articles

References

Althusser, L., & Brewster, B. R. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA29894356
Bernays, E. L. (1947). The Engineering of Consent. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 250(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624725000116
Curran, J., & Seaton, J. (2002). Power Without Responsibility. Routledge.
Fajri, D. A., & Noverino, R. (2019). CRITIQUE OF IDEOLOGY BIN GEORGE ORWELL’S NOVEL 1984: A HANS-GEORG GADAMER’S HERMENEUTICS READING. Journal of Language and Literature, 7(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.35760/jll.2019.v7i2.2017
González, V., & Ana, M. (2021). FROM THE MINISTRY OF TRUTH TO THE FILTER BUBBLE: MANIPULATION OF DISCOURSE IN 1984 AND THE LOUDEST VOICE. http://tauja.ujaen.es/handle/10953.1/13818
Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2011). Manufacturing Consent. Pantheon.
Jic, A. (2010). An interdisciplinary approach to George Orwell’s novels: exploring totalitarian manipulation techniques in ”Nineteen Eighty-Four” through Humanistic P. Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Philologica, 11(2), 105–129. https://www.ceeol.com/content-files/document-105878.pdf
Orwell, G. (2004). Why I write (Penguin Modern Classics ed.). Penguin Books.
Orwell, G. (2019). 1984. FingerPrint Classics, an imprint of Prakash Books India Pvt. Ltd.
Premanand, K., & Kasirajan, M. (2020). Media Manipulation as a Psychological Warfare in George Orwell’s 1984. Shanlax International Journal of English, 9(S1-i2-Dec), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.34293/english.v9is1.3678