Philosophical reflection drawn from the experience of the design weaknesses of PhD students through research activities

Main Article Content

Bemena Bruce
JERSON Aurélien
TOTOHASINA André
FENO Daniel Rajaonasy
ARMAND -

Abstract

The productivity generated by doctoral research activities requires exclusively laborious work in order to have yields with all the qualities practically satisfactory for these tasks. The implementation of the state of the art and the construction of a "preprint" are among the occupations of capital importance among the conditions necessary to complete a thesis. They need more very specific knowledge, in other words, full of joy, will, passion, intuition, etc. Faced with this circumstance, doctoral students sometimes have often invalid excuses brought by complexes of uncertainties. Subsequently, this paper explains “how can a PhD student appropriate the working methods in order to enable him to manage his thesis work as well as possible? ".

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bruce, B., Aurélien, J., André, T., Daniel Rajaonasy, F., & -, A. (2025). Philosophical reflection drawn from the experience of the design weaknesses of PhD students through research activities. Journal of Research and Multidisciplinary, 8(1), 993-1019. https://doi.org/10.5281/jrm.v8i1.106
Section
Articles

References

A. Anne-Braun. (2016). How does it work? Une lecture de la thélorie des symboles
de Nelson Goodman. PhD thesis, Université Panthélon-Sorbonne.
N. Goodman. (1994). Reconceptions in philosophy and other arts and sciences
(withcatherine elgin), indianapolis, hackett & london, routledge, 1988,
trad. fr. comettij-p. & pouivet r.l. Paris, PUF.
N. Goodman. (2005). Languages of art : An approach to a theory of symbols.
indianapolis, bobbs- merrill. trad. fr. J. Morizot, Paris, Hachette, 1968.
Giocanti and Sylvia. (2002.). Descartes face au doute scandaleux des sceptiques.
Dixseptième siècle, 217, pages 663–673.
Hobson, and Marian. (2008). Le point et le rétroviseur : Diderot ou comment
figurer le temps. Archives de Philosophie 71, pages 663–673.
H. Kahane. (1965). Goodman’s entrenchment theory, philosophy of science. Pages
377–383.
Markovitz and Francine. (2006). La place du lecteur et de l’auteur dans une
énumération. Corpus. Revue de philosophie 51, pages 329–364.
J. Morizot. (2011). Phenomenalism in epistemology, physicalim. Aesthetics,
Principia, pages 439–452.
R. Pouivet. (1997). L’irréalisme : deux réticences, philosophia scientiae 2. Pages
179–195.
I. Scheffler. (2001). My quarrels with nelson goodman, philosophy and
phenomenological research, 62, 3. pages 665–677.
Gaston Bachelard. (1934). Le nouvel esprit scientifique. Paris, Presses universitaires
de France.
René Descartes. (1596 - 1650). Discours de la méthode. Édition électronique (ePub)
v. : 1,0 : Les Échos du Maquis, 2011., 1637
R. Dilao and T. (2000). Domingos, A general approach to the modelling of trophic
chains, Ecological Modelling 132 191-202.
Bourdieu, P. (1989) ‘How schools help reproduce the social order’, Current
Contents: Social and Behavioural Science, 21(8): 16.
Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of
Education. New York: Macmillan.
Ernest, P. (1991) The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. Basingstoke: Falmer Press.
Fielding, M. and S. Bragg (2003) Students as Researchers: Making a Difference.
Cambridge: Pearson.